The ‘Natural’ History of Plastics is … well, ‘Circular’
Today’s Renewable Revolution in biobased polymers points backward to the first major commercial plastic — Celluloid, cellulose nitrate derived from cotton or wood pulp, and used for photographic film stock, shirt cuffs and collars, and pool balls, among others. (Photo: Getty Images/Serg_Velusceac)
This blog post started with my refrigerator. I took out a carton of milk for my morning tea and my wife’s breakfast cereal, and it smelled … off. The only milk I had on hand had gone sour.
Not the best way to start the day. But it did get me thinking about lactic acid (the sour taste in spoiled milk) and polylactic acid (PLA) the leading biopolymer today. While I was explaining this fascinating connection to my wife, who may have been less fascinated, I thought, Wait a minute … milk was used for plastics a long, long time before PLA was invented.
And then it dawned on me: Chemical companies today are in a rush to convert their plastic products to biobased “renewable” feedstocks—but that’s exactly what the first plastics were made from. Celluloid, the first commercially successful synthetic plastic (setting aside natural rubber and gutta percha) was made from cotton or wood pulp and commercialized in 1872. And plastic resins based on casein — milk protein — date back to 1897. The latter were used mainly in buttons.
You won’t see any casein-based buttons nowadays, except in a museum or collection of antiques, but cellulose acetate plastics made from wood pulp are still commonly used in eyeglass frames, films appliances, housewares, medical devices, cosmetics and a miscellany of other products.
In the intervening century and a half, the chemical industry fell in love with derivatives of coal, oil and natural gas. But at least one humble biobased feedstock found a home in plastics, unheralded until recently. For almost 60 years, castor oil has been the basis of long-chain nylons such as 610, 11, 1010, 1012 and 410.
In this millennium, the hunt for bio-feedstocks hit high gear, exploiting everything from sugar cane to agricultural waste products, used vegetable oils and tall oil from wood. The results include development of bio-derived ethylene, styrene and butadiene monomers and fully or partially biobased nylon 66 and 46, actetal (POM), polycarbonate, polyetherimide, PET, PBT, PEF, polyethylene, EVA, polypropylene, polystyrene, ABS, SAN, ASA and several other styrenics, thermoplastic starch polymers, and TP elastomers of various types. In the works are bio-derived MMA (the basis of PMMA acrylics) and acrylonitrile. There has even been talk of making PVC from bio-ethylene. According to one market-research firm, the number of suppliers of biobased PE and PP will soon hit double digits.
And biopolymers made wholly or in part by microbial fermentation have mushroomed beyond PLA to a variety of PHAs, PHBs, PBS, PTT and PHBH. One optimistic market report forecasts cumulative average growth of more than 10%/yr for such plastics over the next decade.
You can get a taste of the current action from our previews of new materials at October’s K 2022 show in Düsseldorf, where renewable and recycled (“circular”) plastics will vie for attention. See this month’s Close-Up and next month’s longer feature, both by Senior Editor Lilli Sherman.
You might say we’re in a Renewable Revolution. But you can’t spell revolution without “re,” which signifies “again.” And that’s my point.
And as with all sciences, there are fundamentals that must be considered to do color right. Here’s a helpful start.
In consumer goods markets, there are countless applications for clear plastics such as copolyesters, acrylic, SAN, amorphous nylon, and polycarbonate.
The polymers we work with follow the same principles as the body: the hotter the environment becomes, the less performance we can expect.